KWENU: Our Culture, Our Future

THE IMPARTIAL OBSERVER 

 

Ndiigbo, again Outmaneuvered and Ill-served

Hank Eso

hankeso@aol.com

         

 Sunday 5 March 2010 

 

 In Nigerian politics, Ndiigbo have become a nation of outsiders… As painful as it is to admit, collectively, Ndiigbo are for now, politically irrelevant.

 

Jonathan-Sambo.  Buhari-Bakare. Ribadu-Adeola.  Shekarau-Oyegun.  In these configurations of four presidential tickets, one of which will emerge and lead Nigeria after the April polls, there is a lot of zest for the WA and the ZO, but not for the BIA -- the third leg of the Nigeria’s ethno-political tripod. The Igbo have gone missing!

 

In Nigeria’s political equation, the Igbo have again been outmaneuvered and ill-served. Still, much of their failing, is of their own making. The Igbo are acknowledged entrepreneurs, who without fail have proven bad politicians. In Nigerian politics, Ndiigbo have become a nation of outsiders. Hence, Ndiigbo have arrived yet again at a critical and defining political threshold, just as they did in 1999, 2003 and 2007, but lo and behold, what the Igbo think, feel and wish for in themselves and for Nigeria seems to matter little. 

Ndiigbo know well their fate and that their political marginalization is no longer a figment of their supposition or rhetoric. Other Nigerians know that too, but could care less. What this reality and a deep sense of hopeless resignation points to, is the deep-seated illusion by Ndiigbo that political power is given or gained, in the absence of a grand strategy or hard line negotiations, as well as the equally deep-seated hypocrisy, weakness, and nonchalance in Nigerian politics.

 

Over the past eight years, I have in this space, dwelled extensively on the obvious shortcomings of Igbo politicking.  I have said a lot, and painfully, most my views remain pertinent, and largely vindicated. (see,  The Redefining Calculus of Zoning , Ohanaeze and Overcoming the Limits of Igbo Vision and the Tragedy of a Gifted People, Igbo quandary, The paradox and blithe cruelty of Igbo individualism , Cold reality: "Igbo presidency" in 2007 elusive, When some Igbo leaders become clever by half and Permutations of an Igbo presidency ).  That I am once again, grappling with the confounding aspects of Igbo politics, as a critical component of the vagaries of Nigerian politics, means that things have not changed but, indeed,  worsened. 

Some may not care or admit it, but the challenges Ndiigbo face in Nigerian politics is not just theirs; it is Nigeria’s.  For Ndiigbo, it is escapist and easy to blame others for their fate.  Yet, the prevailing disconnect, is a damning indictment of the Igbo as well as the Nigerian intelligentsia, but one for which the rest of Nigeria are unwilling to accept any culpability. That is the crux of the Igbo dilemma.

In the eddy of the Fourth Republic politics, the political fate of Ndiigbo has never looked so dreary and bad.  Now, they fare worse than they did in the Third Republic, the Second Republic and the First Republic. Nonetheless, time has passed, when Ndiigbo had many opportunities to reflect and do some real introspective soul-searching.  Having not risen to the challenge, it is visibly too late in the game for them to collectively rally to a common cause, so as usual, they will, in ad hoc fashion and in very fractious manner, hitch their camps to different political bandwagons, hoping to stay individually relevant. This, painfully, translates to Ndiigbo being collectively, for now, politically irrelevant. It speaks also to Ndiigbo being involved in politics of retrogression and being seemingly unaware of their folly.

Several months back, several of us (Okonkwo, Ene, Eso, and Maduabum), all pundits on Kwenu.com, received a joint missive from a concerned Igbo, named Dean.  He had several concerns, mostly about the political marginalization of Ndiigbo.  He believed that as pundits, we could influence Igbo leadership elite into toeing the right path for the sake of the Igbo nation while educating our readers.  Dean also asked a critical question: “Given the above realities in Nigeria, how can we help our Igbo nation navigate the dangerous and depressing politics?” He went on to offer his own perspective:

 

The situation does not call for declaring right or wrong for south or north, zoning or no zoning.  The situation calls for cold clear political calculations for the interest of Ndiigbo.  We should not be caught dead or alive with the loser.  Every time we support the loser, we are set back 8 years.  It is better to make friends with a victorious devil than a losing angel. We must not be so divided and scattered in our opinion that the opponent begins to perceive us as inconsequential.  We must not allow the opponent to sense that we can be Balkanized.  We must not cut our own throats and hand it to the enemy on a platter.  We need to tone down the discordant voices reaching our opponents at this time.  Even the Spartans knew when to close ranks and repel the enemy. We must stop the strident support for Jonathan or the north and talk more about what the Igbo vision for Nigeria and our place in it.  We must, at this time, begin the process of informing and sensitizing Ndiigbo on the issues because they make good decision when the issues are explained as Dr. Akanu Ibiam did in the NPN -NPP days.

 

Well, the trajectory and place of Ndiigbo in Nigerian politics is predicated on two facts:  Loss of Igbo vision, core values, and adherence to the maxim of collective interest -igwebuike- and on the flip side, a “conspiracy of silence” by other Nigerians not to forget fully, or forgive fully the arrogance of the Igbo in their attempted secession in 1967.  That singular historical fact, defines how Ndiigbo are treated and perceived, even as I suspect, that hardly any non-Igbo leading politician would have the courage to publicly admit so.

Also, that singular act, has shaped most post-civil-war policies and politics directed at Ndiigbo: be it political appointments, the expropriation of schools that has resulted in great setbacks and the mis-education of Igbo youths, the introduction of preferential admission policies in universities  or the location of federally funded industries and institutions that contribute to enterprise and enabling environments.  Even with the current arrangement that calls for geopolitical zoning, the Igbo heartland, the south-east zone remains economically, politically and otherwise, the most disenfranchised. Southeast is the only geo-political zone comprised of five rather than six states.  So, where is the equity?

Aside from their Babelian tendencies, Ndiigbo fit well into the realm of Karl Popper’s doctrinal on retrogressive and dysfunctional politics orchestrated by the “enemies within”.  There is no need to rehash how the Igbo wasted the opportunity to leverage their holding of the Senate Presidency, the number three national slot, in the eight years of Obasanjo’s administration from 1999 to 2007.

 

Similarly, when the leadership of the ruling PDP party, was zoned to the Igbo, neither Prince Vincent Ogbulafor nor Okwesilieze Nwodo, grasped the enormity of the office to hold it long enough to leverage it to the benefit of Ndiigbo. For Ndiigbo, poor strategic thinking and handling of the so-called presidential zoning arrangement has left them once again, in the lurch and ill served. The truth is that Ndiigbo never placed themselves well, to be relevant or to play a deciding role.  Neither did they understand the pertinent alliances they needed to forge, in order to stay relevant.  If indeed, zoning within PDP is dead, Ndiigbo are the sole losers, since it died at the critical juncture, when it was the turn of Ndiigbo to benefit from it.  

The crux of the Igbo political conundrum, however, is that Ndiigbo no longer have politicians, the caliber of Nnamdi Azikiwe, Mbonu Ojike, Dennis Osadebey, Nwafor Orizu, M.I. Okpara, Akanu Ibaim, K.O. Mbadiwe and even in the latter days, Sam Mbakwe. What they have now, is a slew of egotistic businessmen, who aspire to use politics to enhance their personal interests rather than use their business influence to enhance politics and serve the Igbo nation.  For the average Igbo politician, the bottom line is profit and loss, and essentially, what is in it for me politics.

 

Furthermore and comparatively, of the three major ethno-regional political forums such as Ohanaeze, Arewa Consultative Forum and Afenifere, Ohanaeze if the most fractious, and does not constitute a formidable lobby, rallying political fulcrum or archetypal negotiation bloc. In this context, it is less effective than the others are.  Similarly, the south-east governors have not bargained collectively, not with the rest of the south and not with the rest of the nation.  Their disposition is incongruous with the influence wielded by their northern counterparts. 

 

In fact, Ndiigbo stopped holding their politicians accountable long ago. The choice not to punish them for not representing their people faithfully, has translated to the Igbo nation paying an enduring and painfully epical political price.  The Igbo have a rather earthy but truly pertinent saying: “It is the kind-hearted woman that gets screwed to death”.  That, politically and literarily speaking, is the fate of Ndiigbo.  If others take undue advantage of them, it is because they continue to manifest obvious malleability, and political and collective self-interest weaknesses and taken their self worth and clout for granted. 

 

Moreover, the Igbo politicians shy away from hard bargains and take seeming compromise by other for benevolence. This could hardly be in Nigeria’s dog-eat-dog and do-or-die politics. Igbo politicians have become accustomed to thinking non-strategically, and only with their hearts and pockets and rarely with their heads. Therein lays great political folly!

 

It is inconceivable to think of one Igbo politician that could vouch or claim the ability to deliver Igbo votes to any political party.  Whereas, the incumbent governors have become powerful political brokers, the five Igbo governors, essentially belong to three political parties, PDP, PPA and APGA.  Singularly, or collectively, none of them could give assurance of rallying the Igbo electorate to vote for a presidential ticket.  Other Nigerians know this, and therefore, feel less threatened and much so, less obliged to factor in the risks of offending the Igbo electorate in their considerations.

 

Now, let me return to where I started.  In the end, and as we search for answers to Igbo quandary, our interlocutor, Dean concluded his missive with these words:

 

A time will come when it will be necessary to choose sides.  Again, I believe that you have a big role to play and your opinion will carry more respect and influence.  I believe that the time to choose side will come when all aspirants have declared and formalized their agenda for Nigeria and Igbo, when all alliances have be formed and forged in steel.   

 

That time is now, and as in the past, the political train for 2011 has more or less pulled out of the station and the Igbo nation is not on board, except for a few Igbo political stragglers, who think they are in because they parrot the master’s voice.  These Igbo politicians, who have never sought to create a peaceful, secure and structured enabling environment in their homesteads, but would rather run off to reside in Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt, or Asaba, in order to avoid the blight in their respective states, represent at best, a retrogressive force.  Try as much as they do, they do not represent Igbo interests beyond considering their personal interests as being synonymous with those of Ndiigbo. 

 

Here is my take:  The disenfranchisement and political marginalization of Ndiigbo have lived on in Nigeria’s postwar history. Ndiigbo stopped imaging their problems long ago; hence, they think of ad-hoc solutions and hardly of medium or long-term strategies.  As a people, Ndiigbo need a retreat and engage in introspective soul-searching.  Retooling the dynamics of Igbo politics will not be easy neither will it happen overnight.  There ought to be cognizance that Ndiigbo are where they are because they have never made the Hausa/Fulani or the Yoruba feel the political pain of being indifferent to them and their needs. They do not know how to extract a pound of flesh, even though they are deemed Nigeria’s Shylocks. Nevertheless, it is more worrisome and confounding that after fifty years of being within Nigeria’s political mainstream, Igbo politicians are not cognizant of “Igbo vision for Nigeria and our place in it.   Such shortcomings and growing pains are self-inflicted.

 

With neither anger nor partiality, until next time, keep the law, stay impartial, and observe closely.

--------

Hank Eso is a columnist for Kwenu.com.  His observations on Nigerian, African and global politics and related issues, has appeared in various print media, journals and internet-based sites. © Hank Eso, 5 March 2011.  Email: hankeso@aol.com

Simply surprise yourself yonder